Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05179
Original file (BC 2013 05179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05179

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  YES 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:	

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal.



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His original Purple Heart package was repeatedly misplaced throughout his chain of command.  Both his home station and deployed commanders supported the PH submission for his injuries, which he sustained when an enemy sniper struck his body armor with a shot that sent shrapnel into his neck and face and required medical treatment by a medical officer.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of chief master sergeant (E-9) during the matter in question.  

On 14 Feb 11, the applicant was awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) for the active participation in combat having been personally present and under direct enemy hostile fire on 19 Feb 10.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating the applicant’s request should be denied as he has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to applying to the AFBCMR.  After a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record, award of the PH could not be verified.  The applicant's request was forwarded to the original award approval authority, United States Air Forces Central Command (USCENTCOM), on 17 April 2014 for consideration of the PH, but was disapproved by USCENTCOM on 13 June 2014.  According to the original award approval authority, the applicant's request was disapproved as it did not meet the criteria for award of the PH.  The PH Medal is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who have been wounded, killed, or who have died or may hereafter die of wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States or opposing force as a result of an act of any such enemy or opposing armed force, an international terrorist attack, or during military operations while serving as part of a peace keeping force.  A wound for which the award is made must have required treatment, not merely examination, by a medical officer. Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be documented in the service member’s medical and/or health record.  

If the applicant elects, he may submit for a one-time reconsideration of USCENTOM’s decision; however, USCENTCOM advises they will require new additional/follow-up medical documentation to reconsider the applicant's request.  If after the applicant submits for a one-time reconsideration to USCENTCOM and is denied a second time, only then will he have exhausted his administrative channels and can then submit a new DD Form 149 request for the PH.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  AFPC/DPSID has reviewed this application and indicated the original award approval authority, United States Air Forces Central Command (USCENTCOM) is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued.  In view of this, we find this application is not ripe for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05179 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05179 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 8 Aug 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Sep 14.

						



3



FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03265

    Original file (BC-2013-03265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During these operations, the gun truck approached a privately owned vehicle (POV) traveling the same direction as the convoy. If after the applicant submits for a one-time reconsideration to United States Air Forces Central Command and is denied a second time, only then will he have exhausted his administrative channels and can then submit a new DD Form 149 request for the Purple Heart. However, should after exhausting his administrative avenue of relief, the applicant feel he is still a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02615

    Original file (BC 2012 02615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Sep 12, 11 Jun 13, and 22 Nov 13, the United States Air Force Central (AFCENT) Decorating Processing Unit considered the applicant’s request to be awarded the PH; however, they disapproved all requests. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence the records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. In addition, based on a preponderance of the evidence presented and the lack of official documentation to support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05973

    Original file (BC 2012 05973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) has reviewed this application and stated that the applicant may submit directly to AFCENT for a one-time reconsideration of his request. Therefore, until such time as he has exhausted all available administrative remedies, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief requested. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05973 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02728

    Original file (BC 2014 02728.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH was submitted through the Army; however, he has now been instructed to resubmit through the Air Force since he was in the Air Force during the timeframe in question. In support of his request, the applicant provided as evidence the following: Memorandum – Award of the Purple Heart, dated 31 Jan 14, DA Form 4187 – Personnel Action, copies of three DD Form 214s, copy of his Officer Record Brief, Operation ENDURING FREEDOM Contingency, Exercise and Deployment Orders,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03705

    Original file (BC 2014 03705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03705 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for injuries he received while deployed from September 2004 to March 2005. While shaken, he and his team continued on with their mission because everybody “seemed fine.” At the time of his injuries, little was known about non-visual injuries such as Traumatic Brain Injury...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01886

    Original file (BC 2014 01886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01886 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for injuries he received while deployed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02013

    Original file (BC 2014 02013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02013 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03043

    Original file (BC 2014 03043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When he returned from deployment, he received additional X-rays and an MRI for his right leg and left shoulder. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has twice applied to the United States Air Forces Central...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05166

    Original file (BC 2013 05166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Will be administratively corrected) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was insufficient data at the time his DD Form 214 was prepared. Should the applicant provide the additional documentation requested by AFCENT, he can then be considered for award of the PH. Therefore, aside from the administrative corrections to award the AFCM and the AFCAM, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the additional relief sought...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01129

    Original file (BC-2013-01129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In Jan 2011, he inquired with his chain of command on the status of his PH award and was informed that his package was denied as he did not submit the appeal within one year of the initial disapproval notification as required by AFCENT policy. Information passed from the hospital to his ADCON Air Force unit to the AFCENT Commander was not completely detailed or accurate causing denial of the PH and he requests a review of the provided documents. After the applicant has exhausted this...